Awardee Organization(s): Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center
Principal Investigator(s): Emily Moin, MD, MBE
Official Project Title: Determinants of Access to and Outcomes Following Specialized Palliative Care for Patients with ADRD
AITC Partner: PennAITech
Website(s): https://pair.upenn.edu/

As a supplement to the PennAITech program, we will link electronic health record data from all patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System (Penn Medicine) with inpatient encounters from 2017-2023 to claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) from 2018-2024. The central goal of creating these linkages is to identify determinants of access to and outcomes following specialist palliative care (SPC) for patients with ADRD and other serious illnesses. Engaging SPC clinicians in the longitudinal management of patients with ADRD and other serious illnesses is a key priority, yet patients with ADRD less commonly receive SPC than do patients with cancer and other illnesses, and more commonly experience hospitalizations and inadequate symptom control. To surmount these inequities in care delivery requires filling key knowledge gaps related to the extents to which patients with ADRD experience novel and more holistic patient- centered outcomes than have commonly been measured, and whether patients at risk for poor outcomes can be reliably identified so as to target SPC resources toward them.
We will achieve this central goal and address these knowledge gaps through completion of three specific aims. First, we will quantify differences in SPC consultation among Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries with vs. without AD/ADRD admitted to Penn Medicine hospitals. We will first assess SPC access using the gold-standard approach we have pioneered of measuring signed SPC notes in the electronic health record (EHR), and second using the proportions with Z51.5 billing codes (“encounter for palliative care”) in CMS data. While this claims-based approach is commonly used due to its efficiency, there are many reasons to believe it may not possess favorable operating characteristics, thereby yielding biased conclusions when used as a measure of SPC receipt. Comparing its sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and other measures to our gold standard will elucidate this approach’s utility overall and specifically among patients with ADRD.
Second, we measure changes in calculating a key patient-centered outcome – hospital-free days (HFDs), or days alive and living outside a hospital through 6 months of follow-up – using only EHR data vs. supplementing with CMS data among patients with ADRD and other serious illnesses. We hypothesize that adding CMS data to EHR data will produce more robust and accurate quantification of this critical outcome relative to either method alone. Third, we will build an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model to predict which patients with (1) ADRD and (2) all serious illnesses are at risk for low numbers of HFDs, thereby guiding the allocation of SPC services in practice enabling prognostic enrichment of patients with ADRD in future trials of palliative care interventions using this endpoint.

View Resource